Bad Apologetics (Part 2)

"I can't prove the existence of my god, but hey! Why will I bother myself with all that shit! Let me pass the ball to the nonbelievers."

Very typical.

Most amateur apologists like Mr. Rene Jun Alameda loves to play basketball. They love to throw the burden of proof to the other player - which is easier that giving a defense, right? 

You always find amateur apologists ranting "Atheists claims god doesn't exists so they have  a lot of explaining to do and..." 

Wait?

They started the debate saying their god exists, so why is it now my job to do the explaining?

Bad apologetics (Part 1)

Bad apologetic often use faulty logic and misunderstanding of science. Here's a good example of how amateur apologists utilized the wrong end of the stick to prove the existence of their god. 

In the first post, Mr. Rene Jun Alameda had made an analogy between the invisibility of air and the invisibility of his god. 

This is quite typical for amateur apologists. They will ask non-believers if they can see the wind. So, a non-suspecting person will answer no, she cannot see the wind. This will be followed up by another question - "Do you believe that the wind exists?" or "do you feel the wind?" If she will say yes... Got ya! Now, why would you believe wind exists, you cannot see it? So, VIOLA, the same with god. You cannot see god but you can feel him, just like the wind.