What A Sick Racist!

According to a Fb comment of a Christian named Edranlix Sarzaba

"African didn't evolve. Look at their faces. Why? Is it hard for them to evolve to have beautiful faces? 

I'm not surprised. Racism is a part of being a relidiot.
Yuck!

I guess this is what you learn from reading the bible -  A book that promotes a so-called god favorite "superior" race is baloney full of racism.

Bad Apologetics (Part 2)

"I can't prove the existence of my god, but hey! Why will I bother myself with all that shit! Let me pass the ball to the nonbelievers."

Very typical.

Most amateur apologists like Mr. Rene Jun Alameda loves to play basketball. They love to throw the burden of proof to the other player - which is easier that giving a defense, right? 

You always find amateur apologists ranting "Atheists claims god doesn't exists so they have  a lot of explaining to do and..." 

Wait?

They started the debate saying their god exists, so why is it now my job to do the explaining?

Bad apologetics (Part 1)

Bad apologetic often use faulty logic and misunderstanding of science. Here's a good example of how amateur apologists utilized the wrong end of the stick to prove the existence of their god. 

In the first post, Mr. Rene Jun Alameda had made an analogy between the invisibility of air and the invisibility of his god. 

This is quite typical for amateur apologists. They will ask non-believers if they can see the wind. So, a non-suspecting person will answer no, she cannot see the wind. This will be followed up by another question - "Do you believe that the wind exists?" or "do you feel the wind?" If she will say yes... Got ya! Now, why would you believe wind exists, you cannot see it? So, VIOLA, the same with god. You cannot see god but you can feel him, just like the wind.

Holy Fake

This just in...

Scientists used blood pattern analysis research techniques to study stains on the Shroud, concluding they are inconsistent with a single position.Forensic scientists have once again concluded that the Shroud of Turin, supposedly the burial cloth Jesus was wrapped in after his crucifixion, was artificially created.

Synthetic A Priori

I've noticed that most proof about god's existence rely solely on logical arguments. For me, that is not a very effective way of proving the existence of a "sentient being" (AKA God). R

As one Christian have said, "I want to clarify is that by God I mean the immaterial, timeless, uncaused-cause or in simple words a SENTIENT BEING that caused the conception of the universe." (emphasis mine) 

Does giving me a logical argument about the principle of causality serve as evidence that this "immaterial, timeless, uncaused-cause sentient being" exists? Even if I will accept (without admitting) the principle of causality, it will not established an "immaterial, timeless, uncaused-cause sentient being" as existing by fact. Even if I will add the word "Necessary" to  "sentient being," will it still not become a statement of fact. We will only have statements of logic about the "immaterial, timeless, uncaused-cause sentient being." And the reason? Dyan papasok ang synthetic description.